A
critical challenge that every hospital or healthcare system has to face
is the retirement, defection, or loss of its key leadership. Handing over
the reins to the next generation is no easy task, especially when many healthcare
organizations have no systematic process in place for replacing the CEO
and other leaders.
While
a change in healthcare administration can be tumultuous, the proper implementation
of a succession plan can ease the disruption caused by transition. Simply
put, succession planning is the carefully planned process of orderly transferring
leadership within an organization by recruiting and preparing executives
to assume future key leadership roles. |
|
In
the past, identifying and promoting executive talent was a fairly uncomplicated
procedure. The retiring CEO or board of directors would simply nominate
the number two person in line. But in today's complex business environment,
the answer may not be so simple, especially when downsizing and limited
training opportunities have depleted the available pool of qualified candidates.
Barry
Cesafsky of CES Partners tells us, "Preparing
for the next line of succession is absolutely vital to the future of any
healthcare organization. The problem is most organizations are poorly prepared
for CEO succession."
Planning
Ahead
Clearly
the best solution to the problem of transition challenges is a well-designed
succession plan. When implemented correctly, a good succession plan is an
investment in a healthcare organization’s future, safeguarding its mission,
culture, and business strategy. Properly-designed succession plans should
ideally be in effect well before the retirement of the incumbent CEO, so
that the organization can focus on developing talent over the long term
and allow for a gradual flow of one leadership style to the next. With a
good plan in place, the organization can more easily weather the unexpected,
such as sudden death, disaster, or termination.
An
effective succession plan should include the following elements:
A
well-designed succession plan can allow senior management and HR to adapt
quickly to changes. Because it automatically assures leadership continuity,
a good plan smoothes the transitional process, thereby easing the normal
trauma and uncertainty caused by a CEO's departure. In addition, the succession
planning process can create an opportunity for an organization to redefine
its future goals and direction.
According
to Cesafsky, "Sometimes healthcare systems don't keep pace with current
market conditions and increased competition so it is difficult to shift
gears when the business climate changes. By proactively creating a roadmap
for the future, an organization can reevaluate its direction, identify its
successes and failures, target future goals, and revolutionize its vision.
This makes it much easier to seek out the ideal candidate who can effectively
put that vision into operation."
Developing
the Succession Plan
Transition
plans should be viewed as a long-term investment in the future health of
the organization. While human resources should play a facilitating role
in the transition process, ultimately succession planning is the responsibility
of the trustees and the incumbent CEO. Boards should form distinct succession
planning committees and schedule regular sessions with the CEO to discuss
and assess the planning program, as well as identify and evaluate potential
candidates. Trustees may also decide to discuss and update the succession
plan at the time of the current CEO's annual review.
Ideally,
an effective succession plan should be in place at least five years before
the anticipated retirement of the incumbent CEO. A forward-thinking board
and CEO will bring in outside consultants, such as executive coaches and
recruiters, to encourage an unbiased evaluation of the organization's goals
and direction. Even if an internal candidate looks promising, it is vital
to the planning process to consider outside recruitment, not only to "cover
all the bases" by opening the door to fresh perspectives, but simply
to verify, by comparison, that the preferred candidate is the right person
for the job.
Regional
Director of Human Resources for Providence Health Systems, Hugo Aguas ,
agrees. He tells us, "The more prominent a position is, the more difficult,
not to mention riskier, it can be to find a suitable candidate. While it
is important to look within the organization’s talent pool, bringing in
a key executive from the outside can quite often be a successful alternative
to an internal promotion.” Moreover, proper planning allows plenty of time
for recruitment, training, and mentoring, resulting in a larger pool of
qualified candidates. Potential candidates can assume key roles in strategy
sessions by acting as temporary CEO's to have their performances evaluated
under fire. And by planning ahead, a healthcare system or hospital can appoint
an internally or externally-recruited "interim CEO" for the event
of emergency, especially if a full succession plan has not yet been put
into place. Aguas also believes, “It’s important not only to involve Human
Resources with succession planning, but the organizational development function
needs to play a part.”
Problems
and Pitfalls
While
well-defined succession plans are critical to the future of healthcare organizations,
they are not without certain problems which must be prepared for. A few
of these pitfalls are:
- Though many CEOs
take satisfaction in the process of finding their successors, others
consider it a threatening reminder of their mortality and dispensability.
Therefore they undermine efforts to choose a successor or try to extend
their tenures.
- Despite planning,
succession may have a negative impact on organization morale and business
performance. Change can be traumatic.
- If the CEO is allowed
to handpick a successor, he/she could choose a candidate too like-minded.
- Boards may tend
to select candidates who are "safe" or reflect existing leadership
styles. Therefore they miss valuable opportunities to challenge the
status quo, reevaluate the goals of the organization, and improve performance.
Similarly, they may not look beyond the visible internal pool of senior
executives and so neglect searching from outside the organization for
ideal candidates.
- Some retiring CEO's
can't give up the reins and try to run the show from the sidelines.
- Once the succession
choice becomes visible, the best and brightest potential candidates
may leave the organization.
- Due to downsizing,
many healthcare systems are "lean and mean", resulting in
a reduced pool of available and qualified candidates, especially when
aging senior staff members may be retiring at about the same time.
- An organization
may fail to regularly assess and update its succession planning goals.
- A truly capable
successor may not be well-suited to or interested in a subordinate role
to the CEO.
These
problems can be overcome by regular strategy meetings between the board
and the incumbent CEO, communication of the plan to senior executives and
staff, and by seeking outside input and advice from consultants and executive
recruiters.
In
Summary
Succession
planning is the best way to ensure the ongoing success of any hospital or
healthcare system. By implementing a well-designed, long-term plan, an organization
can effectively weather the unexpected as well as execute seamless transitions
from one generation of leaders to the next.